Yaojie Zeng vs Moobeen Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 06:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Zeng vs M. Kim

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zeng 1 - 0 Kim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yaojie Zeng winning 2 and Moobeen Kim winning 0. The last match between Yaojie Zeng and Moobeen Kim was at the M15 Luan, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Yaojie Zeng getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zeng | 1 |
| Kim | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Luan(06-11-25)
Y. Zeng vs M. Kim H2H Profile
Y. Zeng vs M. Kim Match Preview:
- In second serve points won, Zeng significantly outperforms Kim, achieving nearly 49% compared to Kim's 25%. Could this suggest Zeng’s potential edge in their service games? Most likely, yes.
- Kim has a stronger performance in returning second serves, with a win rate of nearly 48%, overshadowing Zeng's 40.59%. Does this indicate Kim’s potential advantage in return games? It might, but that’s not the whole story.
- Zeng leads in the first serve return stats, claiming victory in approximately 22.3% of these points, while Kim trails at 13.04%. A crucial factor when predicting game outcomes.
- Under pressure, Zeng has slightly better breakpoint save rates at 60% compared to Kim’s 54.55%. Does such a small difference matter? It can in critical junctures.
- From a match-winning perspective, Zeng has a significant lead with a 63.64% win rate over the past year, as opposed to Kim who has not won any matches.
- Both players excel on clay, but Zeng maintains a stronger win rate at 61% versus Kim’s 50%, suggesting a slight edge on this surface.
- Zeng has more experience against higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 238.25, whereas Kim has faced unranked competitors. This disparity hints at Zeng’s higher competition level.
- In deciding sets, Zeng prevails with a 71% win rate, while Kim has not won any such sets. Crucial for predicting outcomes if the match extends to a third set.
- Break point conversions in recent form show Zeng converting 25% of opportunities, better than Kim’s 20%, possibly indicating greater efficiency under pressure situations.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Looking at the players' recent performances and comparing key statistics, Zeng displays a notable advantage in several areas. Zeng's ability to win nearly half of the points on the second serve, coupled with superior breakpoint saving statistics, indicates a stronger service game overall.
Although Kim has a slight edge in second serve returns, Zeng’s superior performance in crucial aspects like first serve returns and competing against higher-ranked players gives a clearer picture of dominance in match settings.
Additionally, Zeng’s ability to prevail in deciding sets suggests mental resilience and stamina, which could be decisive if the match extends beyond straight sets.
Considering these factors and Zeng's overall higher win percentage and competition level, Zeng is favored to win this upcoming match against Kim. This data-driven analysis clearly indicates Zeng's potential edge for victory.
Yaojie Zeng vs Moobeen Kim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Zeng vs M. Kim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:54:54 | Average Match Time | 1:54:54 |
| 62% (41/66) | 1st Serve % | 48% (32/67) |
| 71% (29/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 64% (16/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
| 45% (30/67) | Return Points Win % | 32% (21/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Zeng Recent Matches Played
M. Kim Recent Matches Played

Y. Zeng vs M. Kim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.62% (71/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 52.68% (157/141) | Sets Win/Loss | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 51.10% (1485/1421) | Games Win/Loss | 31.76% (27/58) |
| 52.88% (55/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 550 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.78 |
| 301 | Total Double Faults | 32 |
| 1:17:25 | Average Match Time | 1:17:1 |
| 282.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 179.8 |
| 59% (3476/5908) | 1st Serve % | 54% (133/247) |
| 71% (2467/3476) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (81/133) |
| 48% (1170/2432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (39/114) |
| 43% (213/500) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (9/31) |
| 37% (2181/5838) | Return Points Win % | 37% (84/227) |
| 29.41% (5/12) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.41% (66/47) | Futures W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 54% (70/129) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (14/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (22/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 88% (67/59) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 12% (67/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 19% (63/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |